The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart delineates that how the children travelled from one country to another via using various modes of transport. The graph illustrates the data for the children between the age 5 and 12 in the year 1990 and 2010.
Overall, car passenger amount has almost doubled over the period. On the contrary, walking and bus utilization almost dropped to half over the years.
In regards with the year 1990, roughly 4. 5 million students used car that was recorded as the least among the other modes of the transport. However, almost similar number(6 million) of the children preferred cycling or walking and bus. The double of the amount that was for cycling recorded the highest for walking( approximately 12 millions). Likewise, bus usage was 1 million more added to the cycling that is, almost 7 million.
In the year 2010, the least number of the children do cycling(2 millions). However, substantial increase of 1 million added in cycling accounted for walking and bus. Similarly, 2 and 3 millions more in cycling was for bus(5 million) utilization and walking(6 million). The crucial amount to be observed is for the use of car passenger(11 million) that was the highest amount in 2010.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-26 | HASAN.511 | view | |
| 2023-05-08 | vuhungbo | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-08 | vuhungbo | 79 | view |
| 2023-03-15 | Areeb Rooman | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-18 | khanhkhanhkhanhkhanhkhanh | view |
- In many countries people are moving away from rural areas towards urban areas Why do you think this is happening 61
- First impression is the last impression It is believed that doing well in the interview is the main factor for selected for the position Do you agree or disagree 56
- The diagram shows how apple is canned Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 61
- Some people think that it is always an advantage to buy local products rather than those made in other countries Agree or disagree 67
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010 and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compar 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, likewise, similarly, as for, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 985.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.925 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58394562636 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 279.9 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.8422774986 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.7692307692 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3846153846 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.07692307692 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124705061984 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568604282286 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820700126502 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099848487876 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109585738295 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.66 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.