The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The bar chart illustrates the information about the numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles commuted by five different types of public transportation in 2002.
Overall, most incidents and injuries took place on demand response. While this transport achieved the highest figure, rail services recorded by far the lowest one during the given period.
From the given chart, it can be cleary to seen that demand response was the public transport system achieved the highest point in 2002. These figure was registered nearly three times as high as those for the second highest category. There were 225 million PMT incidents and 173 million PMT injuries.
Rail passengers less encountered the problem than other transport services, which was only 20 milion PMT incidents and 17 million PMT injuries. By contrast, a total of 51 million PMT incidents and 35 million injuries PMT were recorded in 2002. These figure approximately doubled those for rail services. The number of passengers met incidents in light rail equally that of heavy rail, at 76 million PMT, there was significant fewer injuries, at 39 million PMT.
- Internet Users as percentage of population 61
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010 73
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050 75
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 73
- The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 63, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tes the information about the numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million p...
^^
Line 5, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...int in 2002. These figure was registered nearly three times as high as those for ...
^^
Line 7, column 318, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d those for rail services. The number of passengers met incidents in light rail e...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27322404372 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62909117334 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612021857923 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.2890804065 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.7 5.23603664747 32% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300886289721 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124461364594 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110396919964 0.0843802449381 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196839130802 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11857315357 0.0819641961636 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.