The chart below shows the percentage of the city s population that does not have any sort of health insurance There is information from 1981 to 2005 in two cities

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the percentage of the city’s population that does not have any sort of health insurance. There is information from 1981 to 2005 in two cities.

The given line graph describes the percentage of uninsured citizens in two American cities from 1981 to 2005. The cities are Boston and Seattle.

Starting from 1981, both cities had nearly the same proportion of people without health insurance, just over 20 percent. A few years later, both cities see a slight increase in that percentage. However, while Seattle witnessed a steeper rise, Boston's percentage of the uninsured started falling soon afterward a bit, then started rising around the year 1990 and consistently went up and reach a peak at 35 percent until 1994. around the year 1994, there was a significant decrease in the rate of Bostonians without health insurance. In Seattle, after an initial rise in the percentage of the uninsured and reached its peak at 40% by 1989, the rate started fluctuating many times but mainly continued to go down further until it reached the lowest point in 2005.

In conclusion, the percentage of people in both cities without health insurance started at the same in 1981 and eventually settles at a percentage below the level in 2005. Besides, Boston's percentage of the uninsured is significantly less than in 1981, whereas Settle's percentage is only a tiny bit lower.

Votes
Average: 5.7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-05-02 HanhDao1911 57 view
2020-05-02 HanhDao1911 view
2020-05-02 HanhDao1911 view
Essays by user HanhDao1911 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Around
... reach a peak at 35 percent until 1994. around the year 1994, there was a significant ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, so, then, whereas, while, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05445544554 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69854659223 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584158415842 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.417550555 43.030603864 145% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.444444444 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257036238935 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126935861405 0.103423049105 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935211181954 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.226441496128 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0818266403796 0.0819641961636 100% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.