The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008.
The given line graph illustrates the income gap between genders in five selected countries between 1978 and 2008.
Overall, it is vividly shown that Australia witnessed the most significant change of increasing while four other countries shared the similar downward trend during the span of time.
On one hand, it is clear that Japan experienced the most considerable difference of almost 50% in earnings between males and females in 1978. However, that figure of Japan steadily decreased to over 40% by the year 2008. Likewise, starting at 29% and 32% respectively, USA and UK together showed a gradual reduction to around 28% at last.
On the other hand, both France and Australia represented smaller income gap in comparison with the former. In terms of France, there was a moderate decline of 2% after 40 years. In contrast, after going through a 20-year period of stability at almost 18%, the lowest income gap in 1978, Australia, surprisingly rose to 24% in the end, overtaking the figure for France.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-14 | bigdaddy2804 | view | |
| 2023-04-14 | bigdaddy2804 | view | |
| 2021-08-15 | phg_phg | 84 | view |
| 2020-05-08 | Munn Nguyen | 84 | view |
| 2020-02-15 | khoibeo3g | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the average time spent by four car manufacturers to produce vehicles at their US factories
- The graph below shows the changes in UK birth rate of women in 6 different age groups from 1973 to 2008 69
- The given line graph compares the average number of hours taken to produce a car by four selected companies in US from 1998 to 2005 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of difference in income between men and women from 1978 to 2008 84
- The graph shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany France Italy and Austria between 1995 and 2005 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, likewise, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09580838323 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69394536029 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670658682635 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9542427595 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.375 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172153871593 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0684401568953 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0703299449787 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10417496263 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0833538056109 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.