The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the figures about how much female members of parliament in European countries.
Overall, it can be seen clearly that four countries except Belgium had a rise while Belgium witnessed a gradual fall.
First, looked at in the first period that it started in 2000 and end in 2004. Begium was about 16% - 17% in 2000. and it increase remarkably. United Kingdom witnessed a sharp climb in 2004, two times as high as in 2000. Italy was about 26% in 2000, it rise gradually in the next five years. France went up sharply about the next 4 years and reached of a peak above 35% in 2004. Germany was rose slowly between 2000 and 2004.
Second, from 2004 and 2012, it saw a lot of changes in all countries. UK continued to rise sharply from 2004 to 2012. In 2012, it reached approximately 27%, in comparison with 10% in 2004. Begium increased gradually in 2008. After that, it fell slightly. Frace had a fluctuation. It saw a significant decline in 2008. Then a steady growth in 2012. Italy climbed slowly in 2008. Then it rose sharply and reached at approximately 40%, on top of the peak. Germany stayed unchanged between 2004 to 2008. Then it did not change much due to a gradually increase in 2012.
- In recent years the structure of a family and the role of its members are gradually changing What kinds of changes can occur Do you think these changes are positive and negative Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own 61
- In many countries today if people want to find work they have to move away from their families and friends Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The graph below shows the production levels of the main kinds of fuel in the UK between 1981 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The graph shows the value in US dollars in millions of dollars of investment in funds of four categories from 1988 to 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The diagrams below show two cutting tools made from stone They are from an early period and a later period of human history The tools were made by breaking off small pieces of stone Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features an 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 114, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: And
...04. Begium was about 16% - 17% in 2000. and it increase remarkably. United Kingdom ...
^^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'increases'?
Suggestion: increases
...ium was about 16% - 17% in 2000. and it increase remarkably. United Kingdom witnessed a ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 252, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'rises'?
Suggestion: rises
...n 2000. Italy was about 26% in 2000, it rise gradually in the next five years. Franc...
^^^^
Line 4, column 535, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('gradually') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
...008. Then it did not change much due to a gradually increase in 2012.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56164383562 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50903738415 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557077625571 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 8.94146341463 235% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 10.0 22.4926829268 44% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.1131325507 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 47.5714285714 112.824112599 42% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 10.4285714286 22.9334400587 45% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.90476190476 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 3.70975609756 270% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.09268292683 269% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.047468940566 0.215688989381 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0129871736893 0.103423049105 13% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435111545849 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0599718385969 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824172605544 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 5.3 13.2329268293 40% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 95.17 61.2550243902 155% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 2.5 10.3012195122 24% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.69 11.4140731707 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.0 10.9970731707 55% => Gunning_fog is low.
text_standard: 6.0 11.0658536585 54% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.