The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in five European countries from 2000 to 2012.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph compares the proportion of female parliament members in five different countries between 2000 and 2012
It is clear that all the percentage of female members of parliament increased over the research period. Additionally, the figure for the UK experienced the most significant change.
In 2000, Germany had the highest percentage of female parliament members, at about 34%, followed by Italy, France, and Belgium was approximately 27 %, 25%, and 17% respectively. The figure for the Uk was nearly one-seventh of Germany, at around 5%. From 2004 to 2010, the percentage of Germany female parliament members rose slowly from 33% to 36%. At the same time, the figures for female members of parliament in the UK, Belgium, and Italy increased sharply.
By 2012, the proportion of Italian female parliament members rose to just under 40% and became the highest figure in the line graph compared to about 37% of Germany female members. There was a rise of 3% after the sudden fall in the proportion of female members of parliament in France form 2004 to 2008 in 2012 in comparison with 28% of the figures for Belgium and the UK.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 118, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ifferent countries between 2000 and 2012 It is clear that all the percentage of f...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 462, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., Belgium, and Italy increased sharply. By 2012, the proportion of Italian femal...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99476439791 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74840152407 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513089005236 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.2307658828 43.030603864 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.25 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 5.23603664747 14% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242851706045 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11688500466 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0882876596664 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174830806885 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537058892533 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.34 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.