The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.
The bar chart illustrates the trends in housing, including a more detailed look at the changes in the ratio of families living in rented housing to owner-occupiers in England and Wales over the span of 83 years from 1918 to 2011.
Looking from an overall perspective, we can see that the gap between rented and owned accommodation was considerable early on, which then narrowed to strike a balance in 1971. However, from that moment on, the gap had widened as the number of households becoming owners had increased.
As for details, the percentage of families choosing rentals had more than halved from around 77 to 35 by the end of the given period, showing an early highest ratio in 1918, a subsequent steady fall to its lowest in 2001 (holding around 30%), and further recovery.
By contrast, the percentage of privately-owned housing went up during the same timescale. Starting from about 22 percent, it reached a peak of nearly 70% in 2001 to slightly decline (about 65%) by the end.
The only exception, however, was 1971 when both rates leveled off at 50 percent.
- The maps below show the changes that took place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 11
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 84
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 78
- THE GLOBAL DEMAND FOR OIL AND GAS IS INCREASING SOME BELIEVE THAT WE SHOULD THEREFORE ENCOURAGE THE EXPLOITATION OF REMOTE AREAS DO THE ADVANTAGES OF THIS OUTWEIGH THE DISADVANTAGES 78
- two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, then, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 889.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83152173913 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76022223668 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.657608695652 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7178035169 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217989074721 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770872029394 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665633680466 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0900046074664 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655221403749 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.