The given bar chart illustrates the proportion of owned household and rented ones in England and Wales during the period of over 90 years.
It is clear that renting households in 1918 was favoured by inhabitants of England and Wales, whereas the year 2001 saw the highest percentage of owing households. It is noticeable that both of these types of accommodations significantly fluctuated during the period mentioned.
As we can see from the chart, from 1918 to 1961, the number of rented households was far higher than owned ones. In particular, about 78% of household were owned, while the rented accommodations accounted for only around 21% in 1918. In the next 40 years, the number of people buying households considerably decreased by 59% in 1961, by contrast, there was a significant increase in the percentage of the rented (41% in 1961). Meanwhile, in 1971, the figure for these types were equal.
Talking to the year 1981, the proportions of the owned and the rented were 40% and 60% respectively. The next 30 years saw a slight rise in the number of rented accommodations, by 69% in 2001, this surpassed the figure for owned households. However, in 2011, the number of English and Wales buying household minimally climbed by 36%, meanwhile, the rented ones slightly fell by 65%.
- Influence of human beings on the world 039 s ecosystem is leading to the extinction of species and loss of bio diversity What are the primary causes of loss of bio diversity What solutions can you suggest 61
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- The diagram illustrates the process that is used to manufacture bricks for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014
- The plans below show the layout of the ground floor of a museum in 1990 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 50
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1073.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94470046083 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89326797869 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534562211982 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1824516382 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.3 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234191502324 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946687740267 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544912602694 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152836767563 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229142083666 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1073.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94470046083 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89326797869 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534562211982 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 306.9 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1824516382 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.3 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234191502324 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0946687740267 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544912602694 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152836767563 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229142083666 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.