The bar graph illustrates the proportion of households in the UK and Wales that owned and rented shelters from 1918 to 2011.
In general, the tendency of these two categories is in contrast. While the citizers eamed money for buying their own houses, the number of residents who seemed to pay for renting accommodation shrunk over period.
By looking at the detail, we can see clearly that in the first year shown, there was only around 23% of households in owned their places and the figure of whom rented shelters kept over 75% of families in England and Wales, which were respectively the lowest and highest datas as a whole. Moreover, the years of 1939 and 1953 had their ratios remain unchanged in both terms of owning and renting with about 32% and 68% in order. Especially, the two percentages met each other by 1971 at exact 50% of households. In addition, in the latest period of 2011, the trend tends to turn different compared to others because of its slight increase in rented accommodations (roughly 32% rose to 35%) and a subtle decrease in owned accommodation (nearly 70% dropped to 65%).
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- More and more fathers are taking a break from their careers so that they can stay home and take care of their children while their wives work This is better for the family than having both parents work full time To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the cases What can be done this problem 89
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, moreover, while, in addition, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73958333333 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6028955231 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661458333333 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.5682302104 43.030603864 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4285714286 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 5.23603664747 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189313957424 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0793847606436 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634603821258 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137683140437 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615066121928 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.