The given bar graph compares the proportion of households in two different kinds of residence over a period of 93 years in two different UK states.
Overall, while the ratio of households residing in the accommodation they own saw a considerable increase overtime, the ratio of those renting an accommodation had plummeted sharply. In 1971, the same proportion of households lived in both the kinds of accommodations.
While, in 1918, nearly 80 percent of households lived in rented accommodation, the proportion had plunged to under 40 percent by 2011, a drop of almost twofold. Similarly, when in 2001, households in owned accommodation peaked at approximately 40 percent, those renting an accommodation reached a bottom at just over 30 percent in 2001.
In 1971, 50 percent of households were living in each of the two residence. When the proportion of households in rented accommodation crested at nearly 80 percent in 1918, the households that owned accommodation in the same year constituted just over a fifth.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and year after It was refurbished The charts showed a result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two periods 67
- The two maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 70
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25609756098 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32260568031 2.65546596893 125% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.493902439024 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1440677792 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.142857143 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4285714286 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176626163459 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901488779803 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595633590637 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113583979035 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570309387879 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.