Given is a bar chart comparing the proportion of households accommodated in rented homes with those living in their owned houses in England and Wales in a 93-year period starting from 1918 to 2011.
Overall, there are two general upward and downward trends. While the percentage of residents in rented houses decreased, that of those who owned their residence climbed.
As can be seen, the vast majority of renters were in 1918. Falling from roughly 78 percent in that year, the percentage of them hit its lowest point in 2001 at just over 30 percent, following a constant climb. Afterwards, a slight growth occurred and nearly 35 percent of households decided to rent a house.
On the contrary, a minority of people in 1918 were accommodated in houses of their own. Whereas approximately 22 percent of households lived in owned houses, the proportion of them witnessed a significant rise during the period and peaked at just under 70 percent in 2001. However, it then fell slightly by about 5 percent in 2011. It is interesting to note that the percentage of owners and renters equaled in 1971.
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Task 2: Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negativedevelopment?Give reasons for your answ 73
- IELTS Task 1 - Tables give information about sales of fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement? 56
- The pie charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91978609626 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72687425001 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609625668449 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.0938896402 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190931820305 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070940483991 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647269359609 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123855526742 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0688641399253 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.