The chart below shows the percentage of male and female smokers in Britain during the period between 1950 and 1990.
The bar chart compares the proportions of British men and women who smoked from 1950 to 1990.
It is clearly shown that while the number of smoking men fell significantly, the opposite trend was true for the figure of smoking women during the period shown. Additionally, men outnumbered women in smoking.
In 1950, there was nearly eight in ten of men smoked compared to 15% that of women. The figure for male smokers gradually decreased to just over 70% when the percentage of female smokers began to rise and almost doubled after 20 years. Then the proportion of smoking men remained stable until 1980; the number of smoking women reached its peak at 40%.
At the end of the surveyed period, a sudden drop in the percentage of men in terms of smoking accounted for just over 40%. In comparison, the same pattern experienced in the figure of women smoked, at about a third in total.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-12 | quanganh3110 | 86 | view |
- The charts below show the performance of a bus company in terms of punctuality both target and actual and the number of complaints from the passengers from 1999 to 2003 69
- A rise in the standard of living in a country only seems to benefit cities rather than rural areas. What problems might this difference causes? How might these problems reduce? 78
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in group while others believe that it is better for them to study on their own. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- the chart below shows the amount of time that 10 to 15 year old spend chatting on the internet and playing on games consoles on an average school day in the UK. 73
- Computer technologies are more accessible and cheaper as the result more adults work at home and children study at home Is this a positive or negative development 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 739.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73717948718 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50845873401 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583333333333 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4834652406 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.375 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144739285258 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0627169419124 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622808496812 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934879079517 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393590858158 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.