The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010.
The bar chart illustrates how many men and women were working as teachers in six kinds of different British teaching places in 2010. Overall, it is clear that there was a gap in male and female teachers working in various schools except college where the number of men was equal to that of women, and the extremely obvious differences were in nursery/pre-school and primary school.
Starting with nursery/pre-school, primary school and secondary school, there were more female teachers than male ones. The largest gap could be seen in nursery/pre-school where 95% women but only 5% men taught. It was followed by that in primary school where there were 90% women but 10% men. The smallest gap was in secondary school, 55% versus 45%.
Turning now to private training institute and university, however, the percentage of male teachers exceeded that of female counterparts. Compared with 30% women, 70% men educated in university. 55% males instructed in private training institute while 45% females did so.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-02-08 | rutuja1234 | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the demand for electricity in England during typical days in winter and summer. The pie chart shows how electricity is used in an average English home. 89
- some people think that good health is important to everyone, so medical services should not be run by profit-making companies. Do the disadvantages of private health care outweigh the advantages? 78
- A rise in the standard of living in a country often only seems to benefit cities rather than rural areas What problems might this difference cause How might these problems be reduced 84
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 84
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 847.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1963190184 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04753018852 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59509202454 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.1231010292 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1111111111 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174524259178 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07852973876 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0694147199066 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132213224141 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629724556951 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.