The chart below shows the percentage of the population in the UK who consumed the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables in 2002, 2006 and 2010.
The bar chart compares three different types of people, namely male, female and child, in terms of the amount of consumption of fruit and vegetables in three various years in England.
Looking at the graph, it is immediately obvious that women using fruit and vegetables was the highest in all three years of the survey, the opposite was true for children.
In all three years, there was a small difference in the percentage of boys and girls who consumed enough fruit and vegetables every day. In 2002, a quarter of lady ate fruit and vegetables, followed by the gentleman with a little smaller number at 22%. Over the four years ensuing, the quantity of women and men using two categories also increased mildly by about 7% to 32% and 28%, respectively. On the other hand, this being also the figure for both gender was the highest in the three examined years. In four years later, the proportion of man and their counterpart who consuming fruit and vegetables decreased, with 24% for males and 27% for females.
Regarding children, the smallest rate of children applying the daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetables was recorded with only 11% in 2002, by half as much as that of men in the same year. Following that, the figure for children rose slightly to 16% in 2006 before falling marginally to 14% in the rest of the survey.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-27 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-08 | Chloe Tran | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-18 | Cicihg | view | |
| 2022-02-03 | phuongchi17899 | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-03 | phuongchi17899 | 70 | view |
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The maps below show Hunderstone town at present and a proposed plan for it 67
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is it a positive or negative development 82
- In many countries people like to eat a wider range of food that cannot be grown in their local place Therefore much of the food people eat today has to come from other regions Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh disadvantages 84
- The line graph below gives information about the percentage of women aged 15 64 in employment between 2003 and 2009 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, regarding, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1109.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73931623932 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52662424641 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564102564103 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 324.9 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.8332798116 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.222222222 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21559056066 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0864971193338 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0674134044521 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122670875911 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406447739077 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.