Many employers find that their new employees lack sufficient interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team. What are the causes? Can you suggest some possible solutions?
Today, most recruiters realize that their newly-hired staff are in the absence of soft skills, such as team working. In my perspective, there are some primary causes leading to this phenomenon. This essay will outline as well as present some measures to tackle them.
First of all, the lack of interpersonal skills in new employees is attributed to the education system. Tertiary education nowadays seems to focus on training students to excel in their major theoretical subjects rather than equipping them with fundamental soft skills. As a result, many fresh graduates are not able to cooperate effectively with their colleagues in the workplace despite owning extensive expertise. Secondly, the young wrongly assess the importance of interpersonal skills while they are still in school. According to a survey, more than 90% of interviewed students answered that they think that just achieving a good university degree is enough to work in big companies.
There are some solutions that should be implemented in order to address the problem. Universities should clarify the importance of soft skills for students through forum sessions and can organize workshops which teach that skills. In addition, undergraduates can participate in clubs to enhance their communication skills or support organizing events in their school to train their teamwork skills.
In conclusion, a lack of basic interpersonal skills in new employees stems from the education system and incorrect perceptions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-24 | zhao_kangg | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-22 | hueyy | 84 | view |
| 2022-10-07 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-07 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | binhan_04 | 84 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage growth in average property prices in three different countries between 2007 and 2010. 56
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions Do you agree or disagree 70
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on di erent days 89
- The illustration shows information about how an igloo is built from snow 73
- The maps below compare 2 floor plans of one trade conference held in 2009 and 2010 83
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1268.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 229.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53711790393 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9884186234 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633187772926 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8143419605 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.666666667 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0833333333 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283435976526 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917887681901 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609813172371 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155214489917 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367190484746 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.