Many employers find that their new employees lack sufficient interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team What are the causes Can you suggest some possible solutions

Essay topics:

Many employers find that their new employees lack sufficient interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team. What are the causes? Can you suggest some possible solutions?

In this day and age, many senior workers find newcomers lacking adequate soft skills in order to collaborate with other colleagues in a team. This essay will shed light on several reasons resulting in this current phenomenon, as well as suggesting effective methods to mitigate the situation.

To commence with, the present phenomenon can be ascribed to the significant increase in the number of hours of study conducted by graduates when they were high school students. It is undoubted that students nowadays spend a great deal of their time absorbing knowledge, reading materials, and reviewing the information accommodated by teachers. This is especially true for 12th-grade students who invariably spend at least 8 to 10 hours daily studying and taking simulated tests with a view to evaluating themselves and amending their weaknesses so that they can stay well-prepared for essential examinations such as GCSE or Gaokao. As accomplishing excellent results denotes having more chances to be approved by first-class universities such as Oxford, Cambridge, or Beijing, more learners make their best attempt to study as much as possible. In addition, nowadays, more youngsters spend a considerable amount of their time contacting with individuals virtually via Messenger or Instagram. Due to a significant decrease in the number of hours for physical communication, graduates do not possess adequate soft skills to interact and cooperate effectively with one another.

However, there are several methods that can be implemented so as to mitigate the current situation. First, it is crucial that schools and educators organize more extracurricular and outdoor activities that teachers and students can all engage in regardless of social status and background. This can bring various benefits to students as they can spend more time with friends and teachers, thus consolidating the connection between individuals, as well as developing fundamental interpersonal skills such as communicating courteously and working efficiently with people. Moreover, young people should be encouraged to participate in social activities operated by charitable organizations before seeking employment. By joining these activities not only can the young learn valuable experience from people from all walks of life and enhance their life skills, but they can also assist underprivileged people and contribute tremendously to the improvement of society.

In conclusion, the aforementioned factors have caused young adults to lack sufficient interpersonal skills to work well with others as a team at the workplace; however, several measures, when implemented, can greatly alleviate the current phenomenon.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-09-24 zhao_kangg 78 view
2022-10-22 hueyy 84 view
2022-10-07 Nguyen Manh Dung 89 view
2022-10-07 Nguyen Manh Dung 56 view
2021-09-04 binhan_04 84 view
Essays by user zhao_kangg :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cooperate effectively with one another. However, there are several methods that ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...several methods that can be implemented so as to mitigate the current situation. First, ...
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, as to, at least, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2296.0 1615.20841683 142% => OK
No of words: 402.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71144278607 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22303594365 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589552238806 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 701.1 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.8405852988 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.0 106.682146367 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7142857143 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22267684705 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719464864274 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715243153219 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149584170361 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506444942377 0.056905535591 89% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 13.0946893788 151% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.43 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.