The chart below shows the percentage of UK households with selected consumers durable between 1996 to 2006.
The given bar graph illustrates the information regarding the consumption of gadgets for their house by the UK dwellers between 10 years.
As can be witnessed from the given information in year 1996 and 2006 people who lived in UK used telephone for communication was about 100% which was the highest consumption at that time whereas microwave, Fridge and Washing Machine prioritised as the same level in year 1996 it was merely 70%.
Further demonstrating the key features ,the proportion of 80% microwave was purchased by the UK dwellers in year 2006 and Fridge and Washing Machine percentage was 2% less than microwave. Moving towards mobile phone used by UK masses was 20% in first given year which was incline by two-forth as percentage in 2nd given year. Probing ahead merely 10% of people consumed internet in 1996 proportion for internet mushroomed in year 2006 to 60%.
Overall, high proportion of telephone used by UK dwellers in both ears however, merely one percent of internet consumed by people which was rose to 60%.
- The graph below show the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a Europeon country between 1979 and 2004 61
- The graph below show the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a Europeon country between 1979 and 2004
- The graph below show the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a Europeon country between 1979 and 2004 56
- Some people believe that natural ability is necessary to be successful at sports others believe that hard work and practice is more important discuss both sides and opinion 56
- Some people believe that natural ability is necessary to be successful at sports others believe that hard work and practice is more important discuss both sides and opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...evel in year 1996 it was merely 70%. Further demonstrating the key features ,the pro...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 39, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... Further demonstrating the key features ,the proportion of 80% microwave was purc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, regarding, well, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 866.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00578034682 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73547851898 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549132947977 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.2754867828 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.333333333 112.824112599 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8333333333 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145837471476 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825827597806 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0185403994143 0.0843802449381 22% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0910146970353 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257633314258 0.0819641961636 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.37 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.