Compare the town of brindle and local areas in 1800 1900 and 2000 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pictorial representation illustrate the information regarding the town of brindell and nearby areas in the given three years.
As can be witnessed from the given information that farmland remained identical in the year 1800 and 1900 while in 2000 some less space covered by farmland and that space given to brindle in last given year which was in the south west corner. Moving towards, in the east side there was industry in ear 1900 and 2000 which was uprooted in the first given year.
Feather demonstrating the key features it is Lucid that Woodland in the north-east corner was placed in the big place in first given yeah which was narrowed its Eyes in next given year however in the last given year the space of Woodland was divided into Woodland and bunhill Park river Store was in between the Woodland and industry in all given years probing ahead in a 1900 and 2000 there were made one Hill village for workers which was farmland for animals in in year 1800.
It can be apparently over-viewed that myriad of advancement occurred in the town and local areas of brindle in second given time periods as compared to initial one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-20 | khanhkhanhlhp | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-18 | paula_ngy08 | 61 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of UK households with selected consumers durable between 1996 to 2006 73
- The graph below show the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a Europeon country between 1979 and 2004 56
- The graph below show the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a Europeon country between 1979 and 2004
- The Pie Charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries China and India 61
- The diagram below show the process of taking driving licence Write a report for a University lecturer describing the information below 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 463, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: in
... workers which was farmland for animals in in year 1800. It can be apparently over...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, however, regarding, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 946.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40022915573 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.4926829268 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 133.501161044 43.030603864 310% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 189.2 112.824112599 168% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.0 22.9334400587 174% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2 5.23603664747 214% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135677743738 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0964581638114 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039967158227 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105906844219 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401077672987 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.8 13.2329268293 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.8 61.2550243902 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.5 10.3012195122 160% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.75 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.9970731707 164% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.