The pie charts given illustrate the percentage of water usage based on several purposes in North America, South America, Europe, Africa, Central Asia, and South East Asia. Overall, there are three main types of purposes across these six areas of the world.
It can be observed that most water usage in North America and Europe is mainly used for industrial purposes which accounts for roughly 50% (48% and 53% respectively). In contrast, the rest of the six areas largely focus on using water for agricultural purposes with 71% of water consumption in South America, 84% in Africa, 88% in Central Asia, and 81% in Southeast Asia. Moreover, South America, Africa, and Central Asia are the least favored in using water for industrial purposes and the proportions account for merely 10%, 7%, and 5% respectively. Furthermore, a similar pattern can be seen in North America and Europe where the proportions of water usage for domestic use are the lowest at 13% for the former area and 15% for the latter. In addition, in Southeast Asia, water is prone to be used for industrial activities after agricultural activities (12%).
To sum up, water usage for industrial purposes is dominant in North America and Europe, whereas its counterpart for agricultural purposes plays a main role in the rest of mentioned areas.
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comaparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Asia) must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...South America, Africa, and Central Asia are the least favored in using water for in...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, moreover, so, whereas, in addition, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1097.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03211009174 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.677598811 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.0244575898 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.125 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260246142053 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143229088877 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371928766002 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185022357782 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0330480298412 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.2329268293 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.