The chart below shows the percentage of whole world population in four countries from 1950 to 2000, with projections till 2050, Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Given is a column chart not only comparing the changes in the proportion of population in India, China, USA and Japan in 1950 and 200 but also indicating the predictions for 2050.
As can be seen from the graph, it is clearly evidence that Japan was by far the least populous country. Additionally, apart from India, the share of population of the three remaining nations all saw an upturn trend during the research period.
Looking at the chart in more detail, China accounted for a little over a quarter of the world’s population in 1950, compares to 10% in the figure for USA which was considerably lower. At the same time, the percentage of India stood at 15%. Meanwhile, there was only 5% are Japanese in the worldwide population.
It is estimated that the population of China will gradually drop and would reach approximately 18% by 2050. By contrast, India is expected to be the most densely populated nation with a drastically increase of 12% to about 22% in the rate of population. Simultaneously, the figures for USA and Japan are both projected to witness a decline, with the former falling down to 8% and the latter to just 3% at the end of researching time.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-23 | nbquyen881 | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of whole world population in four countries from 1950 to 2000, with projections till 2050, Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- In a global economy, many goods, including what we use on a daily basis, are transported from other countries in a long distance. To what extent do you think its benefits exceed its drawbacks? 89
- Many people believe that today there is a general increase in anti social behaviour and lack of respect for others What might have caused this situarion How to improve it 82
- The diagram below shows the multistage production of pears as canned fruits. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the process below. 84
- the diagram below shows a simple system that turns dirty water into clean water 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 46, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'evidenced'.
Suggestion: evidenced
...n be seen from the graph, it is clearly evidence that Japan was by far the least populou...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 184, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('drastically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
... the most densely populated nation with a drastically increase of 12% to about 22% in the rate of popu...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, look, so, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7427184466 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8367671071 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606796116505 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8669573634 43.030603864 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.555555556 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8888888889 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139715954728 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544284489154 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0270685426934 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0859083065632 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0107455692233 0.0819641961636 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.