The bar chart illustrates the distribution of men and women pursuing six different art based subjects(Linguistics, Philosophy, English and literature, History and Archeology, Art and Design and Communication and media studies). The data is based out of UK University and charted in the year 2011.
Overall, the number of females outnumbered males by a steady margin throughout the whole year. Subjects like English language and literature has the maximum number of enrollment while Philosophy is the least studied among the whole batch.
Going forward, female scholars pursuing subjects such as Linguistics, Philosophy and History and Archaeology were higher in number as compared to male
scholars by a substantial margin of more than 50 units. Meanwhile, subjects like English language and literature , communication and media have almost identical level of subject preference.
Interestingly, Art and design portrayed different trend altogether. It was observed that the number of males were 50 units more than females when it came to choosing this subject.
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 78
- The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information given 44
- The graph below show the percentage of men and woman aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below show the percentage of men and woman aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the proportion of male and female students studying six art related subjects at a UK university in 2011 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: higher
...osophy and History and Archaeology were higher in number as compared to male scholars by a sub...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ere higher in number as compared to male scholars by a substantial margin of more...
^^^
Line 6, column 113, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...cts like English language and literature , communication and media have almost ide...
^^
Line 6, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... identical level of subject preference. Interestingly, Art and design portrayed ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.675 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21468026504 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6125 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.6179770848 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238320386999 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100332372858 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495351097611 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118010394648 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483833787478 0.0819641961636 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.4140731707 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.