The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the figures of five cities in Australia in terms of the habit of the citizen in purchasing and consuming coffee or tea. Overall, throughout four weeks, spending time at a café seemed to be the most popular option among all, while buying fresh coffee was not very preferable, peaking at the bottom for all of the five cities.
It is readily apparent that people in five chosen cities tend to have a habit of going outside for coffee or tea, as the percentages of that remain the highest in four out of five cities, reaching a peak of nearly 65% in Melbourne whereas being relatively high in Sydney and Hobart with approximately 61% and 63%, respectively. At the same time, the trend was not recorded in Adelaide, which just slightly below 50% of the people enjoy having their drinks at a coffee shop, being surmounted by the choice of buying instant coffee and coming at the second-highest option. Adelaide was the only city where purchasing instant coffee was the most chosen choice among all with 50%, as it always comes at the second-highest in other cities.
In contrast, purchasing fresh coffees was the least frequent choice among the people being surveyed, as it hit the bottom of the chart for all of the given cities, which the lowest percentage being noted was under 35% in both Adelaide and Brisbane. A similar pattern was also spotted in other cities, in which the percentage of people buying their own coffee ranged from nearly 43% to slightly under 45% in Sydney and Melbourne, respectively. In Hobart, the recorded number was still relatively low, staying at below 40%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-14 | anhminhbnvn1 | 84 | view |
| 2023-05-27 | Jessie1526 | view | |
| 2021-06-16 | littledog031136 | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 84
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 57
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 78
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 324, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...y preferable, peaking at the bottom for all of the five cities. It is readily apparent ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
..., as it hit the bottom of the chart for all of the given cities, which the lowest percenta...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, second, so, still, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 277.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83754512635 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55994610032 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 106.607317073 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509025270758 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 398.7 283.868780488 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.7141030842 43.030603864 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.5 112.824112599 148% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.625 22.9334400587 151% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168059323393 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089193602083 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523054005044 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128115325159 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336201796904 0.0819641961636 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.89 61.2550243902 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.