The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates how citizens of five cities in Australia purchased and consumed coffee in the last 4 weeks.
Overall, the percentage of people loving fresh coffee is the smallest while those in 5 cities except for Adelaide prefer going out for drinking to other choices. Citizens of Melbourne tend to consume more coffee than those of other cities.
The number of Melbourne people going to cafes for coffee or tea is the largest, which accounts for about 63%, being nearly equal to that of Sydney and Hobart (with the former being 61% and the later being 62,5%). In addition, the figures for people who bought instant coffee in these three cities are approximately $48%, 46% and54%, respectively while that of fresh coffee lovers are all below 45%.
Adelaide is the only city having the percentage of people preferring instant coffee being the biggest of three choices, with nearly 50%. However, the figure for its fresh coffee, along with Brisbane, comprise the lowest percentage of 5 cities, with only about 34%
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 61
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your opinion 73
- In some countries owning a home rather than renting one is considered very important Why might this be the case Is this a positive or negative development 78
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, while, except for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99418604651 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35225258253 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56976744186 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0077145554 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.714285714 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147719176795 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738086536833 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311672305534 0.0843802449381 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0934057485075 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0213050733649 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.