The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
The chart illustrates the favorite of Australian residents in buying and drinking coffee and tea in five cities (Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Adelaide and Hobart). The survey was carried out in 4 weeks.
In general, the number of people who love instant coffee is lower than who love fresh coffee. Most cities except Adelaide witness their residents love going to café more than buying coffee.
The lowest percentage of people who bought fresh coffee can be seen in Brisbane and Adelaide with nearly 35% while the highest can be seen in Sydney with nearly 44%, followed by Melbourne and Hobart (48% and 50% relatively).
People who live in Hobart, Brisbane and Adelaide love instant coffee the most with above 50% of them buying it. But the number of people who bought instant coffee is lower in Melbourne with around 48% and in Sydney with around 46%.
Only in Adelaide did above half of resident love going to a café for coffee or tea. Sydney, Melbourne and Hobart love café the most with above 60% of their residents who went to a café for tea or coffee, followed by Brisbane with around 56%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-09 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 78 | view |
| 2023-11-12 | Daniel3003 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | susanti | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | anhalice | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Kaythlyn | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 30
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76963350785 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22871900415 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450261780105 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5656888501 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.222222222 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129654153475 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730936220544 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661259053595 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946910515299 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0779861196396 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.99 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.