The chart below shows the results of a survey about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph gives information about consuming of coffee and tea and how people drink them in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane Adelaide and Hobart. Overall, going to a café for coffee or tea is the most popular way of drinking in most cities in last 4 weeks except for Adelaide, while bought fresh coffee is the least used ways in all cities.
According to the chart, people from Melbourne, Sydney and Hobart are the most likely to drink tea or coffee in a café, with more than 60% of them have been to one in last 4 weeks. The second popular way of drinking is buying instant coffee, which is chosen by considerably more than half in Brisbane, nearly 60% in Hobart, and nearly 50% in Adelaide.
On the other hand, buying fresh coffee as a way of consuming coffee was only picked up by less than 35% of the population in Brisbane and Adelaide. Its figure is higher in Sydney with approximately 44% and in Melbourne with 42%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-31 | Madinabonu | 67 | view |
| 2021-06-10 | chathurika2008@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2020-10-08 | viratual | 61 | view |
| 2021-02-17 | Zilola | 78 | view |
| 2021-01-09 | Khakimova KhA | 67 | view |
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 75
- Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected Others say that few wild animals should be protected instead Discuss both views and give your opinion 87
- People now have the freedom to work and live anywhere in the world due to the development of communication technology and transportation Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, while, except for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 756.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52694610778 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40724521033 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.562874251497 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 37.271153576 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8333333333 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 5.23603664747 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165408377878 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0852383635881 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562585915147 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112346130642 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0478857826417 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.29 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.