The chart below shows the results of a survey about people's coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given chart reveals the change in the percentage of residents who live in cities has buying and drinking habits coffee and tea in five different cities in Australian.
Overall, it is crystal clear that the percentage of people went to a cafe for coffee in last four weeks is the popular way in all five cities while the amount of citizens bought fresh coffee in last four weeks drop. City residents who went to a café for coffee or tea always highest point, compared with others.
The figure for a survey about citizens' coffee and tea that go to a café in last 4 weeks in Melbourne reaches a peak at nearly 56%. By contrast, this data in Adelaide hit a bottom, stand at about 35%. Hobart is the second city which has the number of people went to a café for a drink made by coffee or tea in last four weeks, at around the same level of Melbourne.
There is a highest number of nearly 45% in the proportion of city residents in Sydney that bought fresh coffee in last four weeks. Brisbane and Adelaide witness a lowest point of about 35% about people bought instant coffee in last four weeks. The proportion of urban residents in Hobart stand at nearly 55%, where the highest common compared with other cities in Australian.
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much 78
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 74
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals Others say that there are more important environmental problems 73
- The table shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit during the same two period Summaries the 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'habits'' or 'habit's'?
Suggestion: habits'; habit's
... live in cities has buying and drinking habits coffee and tea in five different cities...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 268, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'always the highest'.
Suggestion: always the highest
...ts who went to a café for coffee or tea always highest point, compared with others. The figur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... the same level of Melbourne. There is a highest number of nearly 45% in the pro...
^
Line 4, column 161, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...ur weeks. Brisbane and Adelaide witness a lowest point of about 35% about people ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1008.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2605407416 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.453333333333 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9878030638 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88888888889 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230443189433 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110764934092 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711565134187 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171448744804 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0733623713027 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.