The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billion) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.

The pie chart depicts the amount of calling duration in three modes as follows: local fixed-line, national and international fixed-line, and the last but not the least cellphones in the United Kingdom in a span of seven years from 1995 to 2002. As a general trend, it can be seen that the total talking period though telephone has been increased considerably. I will compare these three methods of communication in the following essay.

Local call duration increased gradually from seventy B.M in 1995 and reached to a peak of 90 B.M in 1998. However, in the following years, it tumbled slowly by 25 B.M in 2002.

National and international calls soar during the study period in a smooth manner in terms of duration and reached to sixty B.M in 2002 from thirty B.M in 1995. While mobile connection time experience the same condition national and international fixed-line, but with a more dramatic upturn. That is to say, it skyrocketed from approximate twenty-five B.M in 1995 to the remarkable number of forty-five B.M in 2002.

By and large, it could be beholden that during this time span, cellphones are gradually growing and becoming more popular than fixed-line methods.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: M
...tion increased gradually from seventy B.M in 1995 and reached to a peak of 90 B.M...
^
Line 3, column 96, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: M
...M in 1995 and reached to a peak of 90 B.M in 1998. However, in the following year...
^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: M
...lowing years, it tumbled slowly by 25 B.M in 2002. National and international...
^
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a smooth manner" with adverb for "smooth"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...onal calls soar during the study period in a smooth manner in terms of duration and reached to six...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 126, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: M
...erms of duration and reached to sixty B.M in 2002 from thirty B.M in 1995. While ...
^
Line 5, column 150, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: M
...ched to sixty B.M in 2002 from thirty B.M in 1995. While mobile connection time e...
^
Line 5, column 354, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: M
...rocketed from approximate twenty-five B.M in 1995 to the remarkable number of for...
^
Line 5, column 405, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: M
...o the remarkable number of forty-five B.M in 2002. By and large, it could be b...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, so, while, by and large, that is to say

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 991.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03045685279 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86558002288 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573604060914 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1779334235 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.111111111 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207574887066 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805263105129 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575959573197 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114806491651 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0690197563999 0.0819641961636 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.