The pie charts break down information about age groups combinations of two countries i.e. Yemen and Italy in two times profiles, one is in the past (the year 2000) and the other is an estimation for 2050. Generally, it can clearly be seen that the majority age class for both countries and for both years is related to middle-age people (15 to 59 years old), while other age groups will be changed dramatically in terms of proportion.
The young-age section (0-14 years) in both countries is predicted to plunge by roughly 13% and 2.5% in Yemen and Italy respectively by 2050.
According to the charts, middle-age class will experience different procedure of change in two countries; that is to say that Yemen’s middle-age population is projected to soar by approximately 11% and culminate to the zenith of 57.3% by 2050, whereas, that of Italy’s will witness a dramatic tumble in this age class by about 15%.
The oldster class will see in either Yemen or Italy, the same population changing fashion which means increase, although with very different trends i.e. about 2% for Yemen and 18% for Italy.
By and large, Yemen, as a developing country, had a considerable young generation population in 2000, and it will gain a more work-age population in 2050. While, Italy had a smaller young population in comparison to its middle-age group and as a result, it will lose its work-age forces in the future.
- 52
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. 73
- Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are difficult, such as the sahara desert or the antarctic.What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places? 89
- The system used for rubbish/garbage collection in your local area is not working properly. This is causing problems for you and your neighbours. Write a letter to the local council:-describe how rubbish collection system is not working properly.- explain 61
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billion) of telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, as a result, by and large, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1173.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8875 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82687683476 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 34.0 22.4926829268 151% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.0158536396 43.030603864 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.571428571 112.824112599 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.2857142857 22.9334400587 150% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388069937141 0.215688989381 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.191562707467 0.103423049105 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592682091074 0.0843802449381 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20754448584 0.15604864568 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415475527286 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.43 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.3012195122 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.6 10.9970731707 142% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.