The chart illustrates the time consuming by using telephone in three call types in UK during the period from 1995 to 2002.
Overall, it is obvious that local fixed line was used most in uk and by seven years, the calls in national and international fixed line and mobiles was rising and decreased with local callings.
The local fixed line was increasing from about 70 billion minutes in 1995 and peaked the top which was 90 billion minutes in 1999. Then, calls in areas had significantly dropped back to the beginning after three years.
In addition, in category of national and international fixed line, the amount of time calling was just by a half in comparison with local fixed line and under 40 billion minutes. Between 1995 and 2002, the number of times of this type slightly rose to 60 billion minutes in 2001 and kept the same as the figure as 2002.
While local fixed line and national and international fixed line were starting by high index, the time spending of mobile phone was under 5 billion minutes in 1995. During the period from 1995 to 1999, it had grown slowly until over 10 billion minutes in using. After that, the number of this type of calling dramatically rocketed and reached 45 billion minutes in 2002 which was triple compared with 1999.
- Tourism is becoming increasingly important as a source of revenue to many countries but its disadvantages should not be overlooked To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honor kindness and trust no longer seems important To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- People in the community can buy cheaper products nowadays Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 79
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes in billion of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 2002 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7264573991 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36735627154 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502242152466 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3499958354 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.111111111 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7777777778 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290320414551 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146301429737 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846143920042 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196049972278 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.092252878567 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.