The chart below shows total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in three categories namely, local, national and international and mobile calls during a period of 7 years starting from 1995 in the UK.
The chart below compares total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in local, national and international and mobile calls during a period of 7 years starting from 1995 in the UK.
The most minutes of telephone calls in every year was local calls while the lowest throughout this time was mobile calls. Also, it should be noted that the local call was almost constant during that span of time. Its experienced rises till 1999 and falls in the last 3 years.
The total number of minutes of national and international calls was increasing at steadily rate from 38 billion to 61 billion minutes respectively. The number of mobile call’s minutes were increased as a same pattern to national and international calls until 1999, where it showed rapid growth until 2002.
To sum up, in 1999 when the total number of local call ‘minutes declined, the mobile calls increased rapidly. In spite of all decreasing rate in local calls, still had popularity among clients.
- Prevention is better than cure."Out of a country's health budget, a large proportion should be diverted from treatment tospending on health education and preventative measures.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- the chart below shows the different levels of post school qualification in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999. 67
- The map below shows the road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010. 73
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014. 73
- DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE. IN 20 YEARS LATER THERE WILL BE FEWER CAR IN USE? 66
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, still, while, in spite of, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99393939394 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63999053898 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569696969697 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3931847593 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.578787144886 0.215688989381 268% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.258694115852 0.103423049105 250% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.238812759349 0.0843802449381 283% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.406291469607 0.15604864568 260% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.247152318631 0.0819641961636 302% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.