The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of
telephone calls in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-
2002.
The given bar chart details a comparative study stating the minute duration(in billions) as recorded from the telephone calls further classified as local, national and international-fixed line, and mobiles in the UK over a period of 8 years from 1995 to 2002.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that over the period as a whole, with a noticeable difference, the national and international, and mobile calls witnessed a significant rise. However, despite an erratic pattern, the local line was by far the busiest one among all.
According to the given illustration, to begin with, just over 70 minutes(billions) of local calls were recorded, which grew substantially over time, reaching a peak of 90 minutes(billions) in 1999. After that, the same observed a sharp plummet before plunging down to regain the initial figure.
By contrast, whilst the National and international lines started with half of the local calls, it experienced a dramatic surge, with 60 minutes(billions) in 2002. On the other hand, mobiles that stood at just 5 minutes(billions) in the start, rose marginally prior to soaring up by 15-fold in 2002.
- In this developed world average life expectancy is increasing what problems will this cause for individuals and society suggest some measures to reduce the impact on ageing population 73
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attractions in Britain in the year 1999 78
- The diagram below shows the water cycle which is the continuous movement of water on above and below the surface of the Earth 78
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- 92
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26630434783 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28623737676 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646739130435 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2058897342 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.428571429 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.85714285714 5.23603664747 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149054636168 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613906654435 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0933489141006 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.097678576573 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108736070719 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.