The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK ,divided into three categories,from 1995 to 2002

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK ,divided into three categories,from 1995 to 2002

The provided bar chart is the representation of time spent on telephone calls in the United Kingdom in a period of 7 years from 1995 till 2002.At a quick glance, it is observed that local fixed line was the most used type of calling throughout the period.

Looking at the details, in 1995, most of the people prefered to talk by local fixed line on which they spent 70 billion minutes.Less than 40 million minutes were spent in national and international fixed line.Whereas, call duration by the mobiles was least preferable choice among the people inwhich only 4 million minutes were used in talk in that same year.

With the passage of time, the duration of calls in local fixed line increased dramatically from 1995 to 1998 and then remained stable for one year. After that, it decreased with the same speed and reached to 55 million minutes till 2000.There was a noticeable increase in the duration of calls in National and international fixed line and it showed an increase of 20 billion minutes throughout the period. However, the calling time in mobiles remained almost similar until 1998 but after that it witnessed a considerable incline and reached upto 50 million minutes at the end of 2002.

Overall, at the end of period, more people prefered to talk by mobiles as they were used to bein the initial years.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-03-21 hieu19101995 78 view
2018-06-21 Ranjit Singh 73 view
Essays by user Ranjit Singh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: At
...a period of 7 years from 1995 till 2002.At a quick glance, it is observed that loc...
^^
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ls, in 1995, most of the people prefered to talk by local fixed line on which the...
^^
Line 3, column 130, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Less
... on which they spent 70 billion minutes.Less than 40 million minutes were spent in n...
^^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Whereas
...n national and international fixed line.Whereas, call duration by the mobiles was least...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...n national and international fixed line.Whereas, call duration by the mobiles was least...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'was the least'.
Suggestion: was the least
...e.Whereas, call duration by the mobiles was least preferable choice among the people inwh...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
...reached to 55 million minutes till 2000.There was a noticeable increase in the durati...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ncrease of 20 billion minutes throughout the period. However, the calling time in...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, look, then, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1100.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80349344978 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60400449684 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502183406114 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 22.4926829268 169% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.0353920912 43.030603864 191% => OK
Chars per sentence: 183.333333333 112.824112599 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.1666666667 22.9334400587 166% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172697455328 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924574758722 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515852538293 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10278414153 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682454987742 0.0819641961636 83% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.3 13.2329268293 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.37 61.2550243902 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 10.3012195122 164% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 11.4329268293 245% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.9970731707 156% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.