the bar graph indicates how many minutes add up to people's mobile phone calls lasting in term of three groups in UK: local fixed line, national and international fixed line and lastly other kinds of mobiles
Overall, UK witnessed that through all the times the local hotline has been the highest among these three categories. Following by is national and international's phone calls, which can be seen always standed in the second position of the chart. Finally all sorts of different calls on moble phone stayed stably in the third position.
To begin with. It's noticeable that over the last 3 years started from 1995, ringings from the regional line moved up gradually by the number stay in the bracket from 3 to 5. From 1998 to 1999 there was only a slight change anh also the year 1999 when it peaked at the highest point 90 billion minutes. From that year on, in contrast it kept falling down constantly by 5 billion at the time and eventually ended up at the number that just over 0 billion minutes
Now we'll talk about how people spent their time on calls from nation and internation. Externally, there wasn't any huge movement apart from the steady growth for the 7-year-period. Speaking of other types of phone calls, among the year 1995 to 1999, the number ascended continually. Since then, it jumped up substantially until 2002 and reached its highest point at a little bit exceeding from 45 billion
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for example working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The chart below shows the total numbers of minutes in billions of telephone calls in the UK divided into three categories from 1995 to 2002 95
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The chart below gives the information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
the bar graph indicates how many minutes ad...
^^^
Line 1, column 207, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d line and lastly other kinds of mobiles Overall, UK witnessed that through all t...
^^^
Line 2, column 246, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...ed in the second position of the chart. Finally all sorts of different calls on moble p...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
...tion and internation. Externally, there wasnt any huge movement apart from the steady...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 368, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...2002 and reached its highest point at a little bit exceeding from 45 billion
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, lastly, second, so, then, third, well, apart from, in contrast, speaking of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1168.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74796747967 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45949404938 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 106.607317073 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630081300813 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.309603288 43.030603864 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.8 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9 5.23603664747 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223747430506 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747530773534 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485046292696 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121763779682 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375703895992 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.