The chart below shows the type of transports young people in four countries prefer to use. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart give information about kind of transport young people in four homelands like to use.
Overall, it is clear that type of transport is far in France is highest among three transport. However, we can see if we look at the specific figures.
Look at the bar chart. It can be seen that, the type of transport is car in Great Britain and USA have the same number is 60%. Meanwhile, human in Great Britain don’t like using motorcycle and only have 10% but in USA, this number increase two times. The type of transport is bicycle in USA just have 10% but in Britain is higher 30%.
With remaining two countries are Germany and France. It is clear that, transport is car are popular in France and have rose figures about 75% and highest among four countries. Meanwhile, the type of transport is motorcycle and bicycle is lowest and have number are respectively is 10% and 15%. By contrast, in Germany transport are popular is bicycle is 45% and second after Bicycle is Car 40%. Finally, motorcycle is lowest 15% but this number higher than in France. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, the transport are popular in all four countries is Car.
- Research indicates that nowadays some consumers are less influenced by advertising than in the past What do you think are the reason for this Is this a positive or negative development 89
- The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in household in one country between 1920 and 2019 Summarizes the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons 67
- The qualities of admirable people 56
- The first graphs show the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The two maps illustrate the changes of a school campus from 1995 to 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, look, second, while, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 7.0 329% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66985645933 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50366824124 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468899521531 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7755762688 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.0769230769 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0769230769 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23076923077 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229322437122 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909003311537 0.103423049105 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101505397485 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156367811552 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865082511563 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.51 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.