The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.

The two pictures given illustrate the changes in a different category of products exported in value and in proportion at two milestones 2015 and 2016.
Overall, after one year, the number of goods being sold increased in four main categories, whereas gems/ jewelry export decreased slightly.
As can be seen from the chart, in 2015, petroleum products brought back the highest earnings of over 60 billion dollars, followed by 56 billion dollars in engineered goods, and 44, 31, and 25 billion dollars in gems/ jewelry, agricultural products, and textiles respectively.
In 2016, the petrol and engineered goods shared the same largest profit with 64 billion dollars, the next was still for jewelry, which decreased by 3 billion, the export in farming goods and textiles also raised slightly to 32 billion dollars in equal.
Regarding the table, the fluctuation the year later in proportion had witnessed significantly. The fastest acceleration was in textiles, with 15,24%, followed by 8,5% and 3% in architectural petroleum goods respectively. The only one that dropped 5,18% was gems and jewelry products.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-29 minhnhat2002 78 view
2024-01-20 hoaithuongnguyen283 84 view
2024-01-20 hoaithuongnguyen283 80 view
2024-01-20 hoaithuongnguyen283 73 view
2023-12-09 Tosyne 78 view
Essays by user lilyngan :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... textiles, with 15,24%, followed by 8,5% and 3% in architectural petroleum goods ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, still, whereas

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35428571429 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88774468881 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634285714286 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.9744154216 43.030603864 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.857142857 112.824112599 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.57142857143 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.166273926401 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731238549509 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0821984740667 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0971892743904 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0858236293271 0.0819641961636 105% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.