The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the revenue from exports of a country from 2015 to 2016, while the table displays the fluctuations of values of each category during the same period.
Overall, a majority of categories experienced rises in values in 2016. Simultaneously, the table provides precise figures regarding proportional changes.
Looking into the chart, it is noticeable that petroleum products and engineered goods topped the chart in terms of making a profit. In detail, in 2015, both sectors received relatively significant revenue, with 61 and 56 billion dollars accordingly. These numbers continued to increase to reach nearly 63 billion dollars in the following year. Agricultural products and textiles were the smallest contributors with figures of both categories being all beneath 32 billion dollars. Moreover, gems and jewellery was the only group to have witnessed a decrease in profit throughout the given period, with the data slightly dropping from 43 to 41 billion dollars, making it the most notable feature.
With regards to the table, it is apparent that textiles underwent the biggest rate of value increase, which was exactly 15.24%. This number is followed by engineered and petroleum products, which obtained 8.5% and 3% of values growth respectively. While gems and jewellery had a 5.17% decline in value, agricultural products barely saw any significant change.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 80 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-09 | Tosyne | 78 | view |
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some say that advertising is extremely successful at persuading us to buy things Other people think that advertising is so common that we no longer pay attention to it Discuss both views and give your opinion 95
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment 67
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, look, moreover, regarding, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1184.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50697674419 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.905506605 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637209302326 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0278561251 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.636363636 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5454545455 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207660426523 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740066263757 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944129201179 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147988936823 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111590050931 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 40.7170731707 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, if, look, moreover, regarding, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1184.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50697674419 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.905506605 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637209302326 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.0278561251 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.636363636 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5454545455 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207660426523 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0740066263757 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0944129201179 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147988936823 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111590050931 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 40.7170731707 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.