The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given chart represents one nation's exports in 5 categories (Petroleum products, Engineered goods, Gems and jewellery, Agricultural products, and Textiles) measured in billion dollars. A comparison between the exports in 2015 and 2016 has been made with respect to percent change.
Exports of Textiles skyrocketed (15.24%) from about 25 Billion Dollars in 2015 to above 30 billion in 2016. Engineered goods soared 8.5% (57 billion USD) to 2016 (almost 63 billion USD).
Slight uprise was seen in Agricultural products of about 0.81% from 30 Billion USD (2015) to almost 31 billion USD (2016). A significant change of 3 percent was noticed in exports of petroleum products from 2015 to 2016.
The only product whose export plunged was that of Gems and jewellery by 5.18% from nearly $ 52 billion (2015) to slightly lower than $ 50 billion(2016).
All in all, the nation's exports grew overall from 2015 to 2016. Wherein, Textiles and Engineered goods saw the highest positive fluctuation, followed by Petroleum products an agricultural products. Gems and jewellery was the only product that experienced a decline.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 80 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-09 | Tosyne | 78 | view |
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 67
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 70
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at 61
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- The tradition of families getting together to eat meals is disappearing What are the reasons What are the impacts 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...ural products, and Textiles measured in billion dollars. A comparison between the expor...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 91, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$52'.
Suggestion: $52
...Gems and jewellery by 5.18% from nearly $ 52 billion 2015 to slightly lower than $ 5...
^^^^
Line 4, column 132, Rule ID: CURRENCY_SPACE[1]
Message: The currency mark is usually written without any whitespace: '$50'.
Suggestion: $50
... 52 billion 2015 to slightly lower than $ 50 billion2016. All in all, the nations e...
^^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'product'?
Suggestion: product
...d by Petroleum products an agricultural products. Gems and jewellery was the only produc...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 927.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26704545455 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80339330337 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539772727273 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.6230801545 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216100052906 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105266018278 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07423646481 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135816930039 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534259954849 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.