The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
The given bar graph gives information about exporting five types of products between 2015 and 2016. While the table illustrates the proportion of change in values for every type of exports compared to 2015.
In general, the initial impression from graph is that the two highest profit for particular country came from petroleum and engineered products . In contrast, the lowest income for this country was from gems and jewellery products.
In 2015, the country earned around 60 and 57 million dollars from petroleum products and engineered goods respectively. While the profit for this state is a half of petroleum products, it is just 31 $ dollars. The least income was from textiles, it is around 27 million dollars. Turning to 2016, it can be seen that a slight increase for the profit from agricultural products by 1 million. While a remarkable rose occurred in engineered goods, and textiles, it is about 5 million.
A table illustrated that the change percentage of the gems and jewellery decreased to 5.18%. this proportion was not as many as one in engineered goods, it is 8.5%. The highest changing rate happened in textiles products, it increased by 15.24%. On contrary, the lowest difference percentage occurred in agriculture products, it is just 0.81%
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how there causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 56
- The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 67
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 56
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... profit for particular country came from petroleum and engineered products . In c...
^^
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... from petroleum and engineered products . In contrast, the lowest income for this...
^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... was from gems and jewellery products. In 2015, the country earned around 60 and ...
^^
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: CURRENCY[2]
Message: The currency mark is usually put at the beginning of the number: '$31'.
Suggestion: $31
... half of petroleum products, it is just 31 $ dollars. The least income was from text...
^^^^
Line 3, column 295, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...und 27 million dollars. Turning to 2016, it can be seen that a slight increase fo...
^^^
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion. While a remarkable rose occurred in engineered goods, and textiles, it is ab...
^^
Line 4, column 94, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
... gems and jewellery decreased to 5.18%. this proportion was not as many as one in en...
^^^^
Line 4, column 343, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n agriculture products, it is just 0.81%
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, well, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1062.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13043478261 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8306359204 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531400966184 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 20.1288747235 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.6923076923 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9230769231 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.07692307692 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156896724265 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611682708198 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072183280793 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112567807226 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0991654651948 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.