Given is the chart comparing 5 types of product from 2015 to 2016 in term of international trade, and the information given in the table presents the difference between 2015 and 2016 by the proportion change in each category of exports.
Overall, it is evident that the superiority of petroleum products and engineered goods was observed in the period given, and textiles had the highest difference between the two years.
According to the chart, an increase of petroleum products reached from around 61billions dollars to about 13 billion dollars. Similarly, engineered goods rose from approximately 57 billion dollars to just below 64 billion dollars. By contrast, a fall was observed in gems and jewellery between just under 44 billion dollars and almost 40 billion dollars although agricultural products almost unchanged and textiles boosted by the highest amount to around 32 billion dollars.
According to the table, textiles had the highest proportion change with 15.24% while the lowest change was observed in agricultural products with 0.81%. Only gems and jewellery had a reserve change with 5.18%. In contrast, the percentage change in petroleum products was 8.5%.
- Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale with others believe it is better to deal with them nationally.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 78
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their was 89
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, well, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37297297297 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79144053284 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497297297297 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7250655676 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.25 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148439656207 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729360480934 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0956208765631 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108903937496 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124288946287 0.0819641961636 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.