The information given in the maps illustrates the future plan and improvements of Islip town compared to it now.
Overall, as we have seen, it is evident that the biggest changes occurred on the road and around shops that placed under countryside.
According to the current state of the town, the main road divided into two roads that are the main road and supportive road in two specific places. Shopping malls work at both sides of the main road whereas divided one road locating at west-south reaches to school while the other placing at east-south directly reaches to park. Housings are at center and southern respectively.
As for planned developments, the road improved into a dual carriageway that is circular, which is influenced by the highest. Previously the main road will demolish in order to build a pedestrian road and shops under the countryside changed into a bus station, shopping centre, car park and new housing that will connect a road. On the other hand, the park on the left side of which new housing will introduce and the school will remain at previously place. The housings moved by a little distance to the right and left.
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment. 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- the charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make compari 67
- Discipline is an ever increasing problem in modern schools. Some people think that discipline should be the responsibilities of teachers, while other thinks this is role of parents. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84771573604 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62690232718 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558375634518 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4399253516 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.111111111 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0809825053034 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442582284806 0.103423049105 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729878809943 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0787472212501 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.094075203614 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.