The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015 IMG 0701

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015.

IMG_0701

There are two figures, one is the bar chart that depicts the income generation from the five types of exported products in the year 2015 and 2016, other is the table that illustrates the percentagewise variation in each product category in the year 2016 in contrast with 2015.
Overall, the export earnings in 2016 was higher than 2015. However, petroleum products made maximum contribution in the export earnings among all. Besides this, textiles had minimum participation in earning but had major difference in export earning in the two consecutive years.
In the bar chart, petroleum products made 60 billion dollars earning in 2015 whereas in 2016 it was just over 60 million, almost the same contribution. Similarly, engineered goods had approximately 60 miilion dollars earningin 2016 and had slight decrease of about 2million dollars in 2015. Gems and jewellery made nealy 40 million dollars contribution in both years, while agricultural products and textiles had lowest contribution of about 30 million dollars.
In the table, only 3% change in percentage could be seen from 2015 to 2016. On comparing both years, textiles had major variation of about 15.24% whereas agricultural products had least alteration. Moreover, enginerred goods, gems and jewellery had change of 8.5% and 5.18% respectively.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-03-29 minhnhat2002 78 view
2024-01-20 hoaithuongnguyen283 84 view
2024-01-20 hoaithuongnguyen283 80 view
2024-01-20 hoaithuongnguyen283 73 view
2023-12-09 Tosyne 78 view
Essays by user Nancysachdeva :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...chart that depicts the income generation from the five types of exported products...
^^
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rted products in the year 2015 and 2016, other is the table that illustrates the ...
^^
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... other is the table that illustrates the percentagewise variation in each product...
^^
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ewise variation in each product category in the year 2016 in contrast with 2015. ...
^^
Line 2, column 256, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ajor difference in export earning in the two consecutive years. In the bar chart...
^^
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the lowest'.
Suggestion: had the lowest
...hile agricultural products and textiles had lowest contribution of about 30 million dollar...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 176, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the least'.
Suggestion: had the least
...ut 15.24% whereas agricultural products had least alteration. Moreover, enginerred goods,...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, moreover, similarly, well, whereas, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1109.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38349514563 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87315084155 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563106796117 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.3602518219 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.9 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241284847839 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106552243312 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0990232033907 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164598092566 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0909456825156 0.0819641961636 111% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.