The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main
The bar chart compares figures for 5 categories of amount of money earning by export in 2015 and 2016. The table shows the information about changing of proportion of values for each category between 2015 and 2016 in one country.
It is clear that the general trend was the increase for both export earnings and the change of percentage in value except the case of gems and jewellery.
In 2015, the country made just over 60 billion dollars in the export of petroleum goods, whereas the figure for export earnings from engineered goods was slightly lower at approximately 57 million dollars. In the next year, export revenues from petroleum products and engineered goods increased 3% and 5% respectively.
The proportion change in values of agricultural products was the lowest with just 0.81% from 31 billion dollars in 2015 and just more a billion dollars in 2016 while this change of textiles was the highest with a significant rise by 15.24% from 26 billions dollars to 30 billions. Gems and jewellery was the only category of products that saw a downward trend with 5.18% decrease.
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 78
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement 73
- The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comaparisons where relevant 67
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 200 and 2010
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, well, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 908.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9347826087 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62494936489 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559782608696 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.8233163861 43.030603864 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.714285714 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336297892605 0.215688989381 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173398044801 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130379434542 0.0843802449381 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215531256643 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166049582846 0.0819641961636 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.