The following chart and table illustrate fluctuations in a nation's export earnings across different types of cargos between 2015 and 2016 measured in billions of dollars and percentage.
Overall,all kinds of products had realised varied levels of increase except the gems and jewelley during the above two years, which shows a moderate drop from approximately 44 to nearly 41 billion dollars, equaling a decline of 5.18%.
Both petroleum products and engineered goods contributed most of the foreign income at the same amount of roughly 64 billon dollars in 2016, whereas they started from more than 60 billion dollars and less than that figure seperately, which translated to the percentage of 3% and 8.5%.
Besides, the rest two products also achieved an income of nearly 32 billion dollars in one year's time, while textiles represented noticablely increase of 15.24% compared with 0.81% of that in agricultrual products.
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 60
- Percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 73
- The charts below show the proportion of British student at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compariso 56
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.Discuss both these views and give your opinion. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...The following chart and table illustrate fluctuations in a nations export earning...
^^
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , all
...ns of dollars and percentage. Overall,all kinds of products had realised varied l...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, well, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 787.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 146.0 196.424390244 74% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3904109589 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.47606760199 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77850129232 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.698630136986 0.547539520022 128% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 35.7875676737 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 196.75 112.824112599 174% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.5 22.9334400587 159% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 5.23603664747 229% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137010282904 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079540096763 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057281777455 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079540096763 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057281777455 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 22.2 13.2329268293 168% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.94 61.2550243902 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.3 10.3012195122 168% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.07 8.06136585366 125% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.