The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling center from 2011 to 2015.
The bar graph gives information about waste things included four types which was gathered by center of recycling from 2011 till 2015.
To begin with, it is clear by analysing graph that, during first year, paper was collected in large quantity (57 tons) in comparison to other three waste items. However, glass represented little less number of tons (48). Yet, tins and garden based garbage had similar count with difference of 3 tons. Apart from that, during 2012, once more, glass was on higher numeral but also decreased with 7 tons. And glass based waste was also decreased from 41tons. Other two items also represented drastic change in their count as tins (27 tons) and garden (15 tons) respectively.
On other hand, in 2013, glass waste was on higher quantity (48 tons) rather than paper (40 tons). Yet, tins and garden was shown similar numerical with difference of 3 tons. Furthermore, during second last era, quantity of waste in all four items was similar to first year of collection. Lastly, during 2015, paper gathered was significantly increased by 70 tons. However, other three which included glass (52), tin (39) and garden (35) tons was represented lower count in number.
Overall, glass based garbage was gathered in higher number as compared to other three during eras from 2011 to 2015 in recycling center.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-19 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- People buy a product if it fulfills their needs there is no need for advertisement To what extent do you agree or disagree with it 61
- Although there is a lot of translation software available learning a language still could be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree 43
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling center from 2011 to 2015 61
- More and more people prefer to buy readymade food from restaurants or convience stories instead of cooking for themselves What are advantages and disadvantages of this 56
- The chart below shows the global sales of different kinds of digital games from 2000 to 2006 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, lastly, second, so, apart from, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91891891892 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36429422545 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522522522523 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.2975383225 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.0 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0769230769 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161825708929 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.06963769737 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893548648097 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160709700117 0.15604864568 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101386818529 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.