The graph provides imformation about how much waste was collected by a recycling centre over a 5-year period, starting from 2011. Overall, there was an upward trend in the amount of all types of waste collected. In addition, the collection of garden waste registered the lowest figures for most of the period, which bottomed in 2012.
In 2011, standing at 57 tons, the data for paper waste winessed a slight dip to reach a record-low of 40 tons in 2013, before a dramatic growth of 30 tons was exhibited in the last year of the period. Meanwhile, the period between 2011 and 2012 experienced a gradual fall of 7 tons in the amount of glass paper, followed by a few fluctuations to hit 52 tons in 2015.
The amount of garden waste, gaining 32 tons in the first year of the period, hit the lowest value on record of 15 tons in 2012. The figure then saw a two-fold increase in 2013, which fluctuate slightly to peak at 35 tons in 2015. Meanwhile, the data for tins waste slowly oscillated to reach at 39 tons at the same period.
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 73
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 78
- The graph below gives information about car ownership in Britain from 1971 to 2007 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... record-low of 40 tons in 2013, before a dramatic growth of 30 tons was exhibited...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, then, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.4708994709 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47097311334 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560846560847 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0419947492 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.625 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.875 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173191804395 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0848722449648 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0875168606007 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130109134537 0.15604864568 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938023813979 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.94 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.