The graph provides information about the average CO2 emission per person in four European countries from 1967 to 2007. From an overall perspective, it is readily apparent that the average emission per person in Italy and Portugal experienced significant upward trends. Meanwhile, the figure for the UK and Sweden showed a considerable inclined.
In the initial year, approximately 11 metric tonnes of CO2 resulted from one person in the UK. This figure then showed a slight move to about 10 metric tonnes in the following two years and finishing the period at around 8.5 metric tonnes in 2007. In comparison to the UK figure, the average number of CO2 emissions per person in Sweden in 1967 was lower by about 2.5 metric tonnes, inclining sharply to more than 10 metric tonnes in 1977 before it experienced an exponential drop to around 7 metric tonnes in 1987. The figure, then, fell considerably and ending the year at the similar figure that of Portugal.
More than 4 metric tonnes of CO2 emission was responsible for one Italian in 1967. The number had risen more than 2 metric tonnes in the following year, and two decades later, the figure experienced a slow change and leveled off just below 8 metric tonnes in the final year. Additionally, the figure for Portugal commenced just below 2 metric tonnes, rising considerably from just above 2 metric tonnes in 1977 to around 5.5 in 1977, and showed a slight grew in the final year.
- The table displays trends concerning the amounts of fast food consumed in Melbourne 56
- Some claim that men are naturally more competitive than women To what extent do you agree or disagree 77
- The graph shows data about the annual earnings of three bakeries in Calgary 2000 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some children find learning history at school very exciting while but many others think it is very boring In what ways can history be brought to life for all school children 61
- The charts show the proportion of holidaymakers of one region staying in different types of accommodation in three different years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Sweden showed a considerable inclined. In the initial year, approximately 11 me...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1196.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84210526316 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62196937462 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.46963562753 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 370.8 283.868780488 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1189478932 43.030603864 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.6 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118232064094 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068354631961 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0968098584636 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113623480182 0.15604864568 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0961412843894 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.