The chart illustrates the percentage of male and female executive in six different types of professions across the Uk in 2007
The chart shows us the distribution of executives by gender across seven widely different career settings from Advertising to Law at UK in the year 2007.
Overall, more than half of the occupations shown the gender gap for each profession was not significant with notable exception of gender-dominated professions such as teaching, therapists and construction.
From the outset, there were more men than women holding jobs in the field of construction and scientist with 90 percent and 60 percent respectively. On the contrary, only ten percent men hold positions in teaching jobs. Journalism, is the only field where the gender gap does not exist and both male and female professionals share same number of positions.
Looking specifically at female positions, women hold more jobs in teaching and as a therapist marking 90% and approximately 80% each. However, males have the least number of positions in both these jobs. In contrast, females only held 10% of the job in male-dominated construction field.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-13 | vanditaverma.v@gmail.com | 78 | view |
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our home leisure and work activities To what extent do the benefits of this mobility outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, in contrast, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34161490683 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14805746575 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652173913043 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4717255681 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.125 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169568992965 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693470228452 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715906887074 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107913822921 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0786529250601 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.