This bar chart provides information of how frequently American people went to fast food restaurants over the years from 2003 to 2013. it is measured in percentage.
From the chart we can see, Both the percentage of eating in fast food restaurants every day and never remained relatively low level under 5% and had a similar trend that it dereased steadily after reaching highest in 2003.
People who had fast food several time a week and once a week changed similarly during the years, in which more people (well above 30% ) went there once per week. The percentage of people who ate fast food once or twice a year experienced a fluctuation by achieving just 30% in 2003, falling by 5% in 2006 and then soaring to almost 35% in 2013. Less than 15% of Americans had fast food a few times a year during the decade.
Overall, the frequency of going to fast food restaurant once a week and once or twice a month accounted the most in USA in the period given.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 67
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both th 73
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people.Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment.Summarise the Information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons whee relevant. 56
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...rants over the years from 2003 to 2013. it is measured in percentage. From the ...
^^
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun time seems to be countable; consider using: 'several times'.
Suggestion: several times
...st in 2003. People who had fast food several time a week and once a week changed similarl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ars, in which more people well above 30% went there once per week. The percentage...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
similarly, so, then, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 787.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.52298850575 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4508175787 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591954022989 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 234.9 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.6027666801 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.428571429 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375845051102 0.215688989381 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163517690065 0.103423049105 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123257096115 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227346230244 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0992676334976 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.