The given chart illustrates comparative data about the frequency of Americans who consumed fast food in dining establishments from 2003 to 2013.
Overall, people have a tendency to visit fast-food restaurants once every week in 2003 and 2006 while in 2013 the majority of people consumed junk food once or twice a month. In contrast, the proportions of daily fast-food consumers account for the least throughout the period.
As can be seen from the chart, the percentage of people who eat junk food on a daily basis and those who never have meals at fast-food eateries were all under 5% over the years. Meanwhile, more than one-third of Americans consume fast-food once a week fast-food in 2003, but the number decreased to around 27% in 2013.
Looking at the chart in more detail, the proportion of Americans consuming fast-food once or twice a month declined by 5% from 2003 to 2006 before reaching a peak at just under 35% in 2013. The figure for people who ate junk food several times a day witnessed a slight fluctuation between 16% and 20% and these numbers were just above that of a few times a year.
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 79
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 925.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76804123711 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6075393277 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567010309278 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 27.8281900825 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.142857143 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7142857143 22.9334400587 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.342492224402 0.215688989381 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.172208014527 0.103423049105 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552002604663 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229701508517 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226248735037 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.